Sponsored By

Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

North Dakota Senate fails bill to cut breast cancer screening costs for state employees

The bill received a 11-5 recommendation to pass from the Senate Appropriations Committee but failed in a narrow 24-22 vote on the Senate floor.

North Dakota Capitol
North Dakota Capitol in Bismarck.
Forum News Service file photo

BISMARCK — The North Dakota Senate voted down a bill on Friday, April 11, that would have cut the cost of breast cancer screenings for state employees.

House Bill 1283 would have prohibited health insurance coverage provided through the Public Employees Retirement System from imposing a deductible, co-payment, coinsurance or other cost-sharing requirement that resulted in out-of-pocket costs for diagnostic or supplemental breast examinations.

This would have included the use of mammograms, MRIs and ultrasounds to screen for breast cancer.

The bill received a 11-5 recommendation to pass from the Senate Appropriations Committee but failed in a narrow 24-22 vote on the Senate floor.

MORE NEWS FROM THE NORTH DAKOTA LEGISLATURE
Armstrong's veto statement did not match the amended version of the bill he transmitted back to the Legislature. Which of those documents matters more? Or is the whole veto invalid?
The Legislature could have to convene to reverse the mishap, but a special session might not be necessary depending on the outcome of a pending attorney general opinion.
Subscribers Only
Gov. Kelly Armstrong has been aggressive with his veto powers this legislative session. Lawmakers now have an opportunity to clap back.
Our takeaway from the session: lawmakers need to stop creating barriers for North Dakota voters to cast a ballot.
🔊 On this Plain Talk, Sen. Josh Boschee reflects on property tax reform, culture war bills, and the ways Republicans and Democrats worked together in Bismarck.
Lawmakers find ways to boost morale with playful, traveling tokens based on speeches and actions on the House and Senate floors.
The incoming and outgoing governors called for an average of $100 million for targeted housing initiatives. The state spent around a third of that.
Detractors of new property tax caps will call them a cap on growth, but they’re not. They’re a cap on sprawl. Communities can still grow, but they must be more responsible about it.
Areas of focus discussed include strong schools, economic security and personal freedom

Conversation

ADVERTISEMENT

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT